Peasants for Democracy (PFD)

by admin

It is a fact that voices of urban elite and urban middle class (known as Fake Civil Society FCS) remain dominant in Pakistani establishment and media. The voices of the majority of poor Pakistanis, particularly those from rural backgrounds, remain ignored or suppressed.

There is therefore a need to form a group of farmers, labourers and poor people to organize and convey their voice to Pakistani establishment and media. Such group has been created namely Peasants for Democracy (PFD).

The founders of the PFD invite all socio-economically disadvantaged rural and urban Pakistanis to join this group. We will however ensure that the PFD does not get hijacked by the urban elite and urban middle class, i.e., the opportunists of the Fake Civil Society (FCS) who we deem responsible for 99% of all sociological, ideological and economic problems facing today’s Pakistan.


Peasants for Democracy (PFD) is an umbrella group of mostly non-urban and poor individuals outraged by the consistent misrepresentation of the people of Pakistan by the urban elite and their urban middle class paraphernalia (FCS). We came together at a meeting in Hussain Chowk (D.I.Khan) on February 2, 2011, which was attended by a number of ordinary citizens including three farmers, two brick kiln workers and a school teacher. An IT student (school teacher’s son) took down the minutes and sent to us by email.

The PFD believes in complete equality on the basis of gender, religion, ethnicity, caste or economic status.

The PFD opposes all FCS organizations and individuals who are known for colluding with the military establishment (and their proxies in media, mullahs and judiciary) to derail democracy and malign politicians.

We respect the right to free speech and encourage discourse. We however strongly oppose those who suppress and misrepresent the voices of the majority of Pakistanis, i.e., peasants, labourers, farmers and those from rural and poor backgrounds.

We will work against the turn towards extremism and hypocrisy in our society.

Rise up to be a part of this movement against the enemies of the poor people of Pakistan.

Rural People Constitute the Majority and the Wisdom

Pakistan is an agricultural country. About 25% of the country’s total land area is under cultivation and is watered by one of the largest irrigation systems in the world. Agriculture accounts for about 23% of GDP and employs about 44% of the labor force.

Only 33% of the population lives in urban areas (dominantly in Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi etc).

Nearly one-quarter of the population is lives below the poverty line. Furthermore, even without urban centres, there is a large number of deprived and poor people.

According to a report:

In Pakistan, the urban population living in katchi abadis varies between 35 and 50 percent. The growth of these informal settlements in the two mega cities, Karachi and Lahore, has particularly been massive. In the former, these settlements increased from 212 in 1958 to more than 500. In Lahore, there are more than 300 katchi abadis, while in Faisalabad, at least 40 percent of the population lives in these abadis.

Source: daily times

Dr Ayesha Siddiqa writes on the rural-urban divide in Pakistan and its implications for political landscape:

There are more urban people, especially the middle class educated ones who have access to national resources through the government or the market, who are concerned about corruption and the credibility of the political leadership, although they do not have any choice in terms of better options. Still, in all probability, this class of people will not leave the comfort of their homes to stand in a queue to cast their vote. But they will crib at home about the pathetic nature of politics.

Then there are people belonging to the lower classes in the cities who will go and vote depending on how active their party of choice and its leaders are in taking them to the polling stations. Many of these people are committed to ideological agendas and are diehard supporters of the PPP and PML-N.

Then there is the 67 per cent population in the rural areas that is not bothered with the middle class’s definition of credibility. This is the segment which has an important role to play in the national elections.

The political perspective of the rural voter is quite different from the lower class, committed voter from the urban centres. While the poor city dweller gets excited by slogans of social equality and expectation of better socio-economic opportunities, the rural voter calculates from the standpoint of the general norm of the political system. This means that this voter responds to a patronage-based political system in which each party provides facilities and rewards to its workers and supporters. This has nothing to do with the villagers’ lack of education and more with his sharp perception of socio-political realities.

Perhaps, the village folk are sharper in their calculation of what they want and how to get it. The rural people know that Pakistani politics is all about patronage where reputation is not based on how clean you have been but on how much you can deliver to your constituents.

This shouldn’t come as a surprise because all powerful groups provide patronage to their members. The military and civil bureaucracy provides patronage to its members and cronies. Similarly, all political parties have their own clientele.

The problem, in fact, is that the common man has fewer benefits and little access to the trickle-down of resources under bureaucratic governments. Such governments put up a show of deciding things on merit which means that there are fewer openings for the common man who cannot boast of academic or other credentials.

Political parties, because they depend on the support of voters, have to provide opportunities to their supporters.

Furthermore, political parties are comparatively less pretentious about merit than bureaucratic governments. Although there is no evidence that governments run by bureaucrats or technocrats care more for merit, they generally pretend to be meritocracies which means that their patronage is limited to a select group of people and not the general public. The typical cronies of bureaucratic regimes (civil and military) are the fairly educated middle class.

Under the circumstances, it is not surprising that so many people turned up at Bhutto’s reception at the airport (in Karachi in 2007). This further strengthened the public perception that Benazir Bhutto is powerful and could win elections as well which, in turn, would mean that she would be in a position to bring benefits to her clientele. The rural voters, particularly in Punjab and Sindh, appear to be impressed by this fact more than anything else.

An educated middle class Pakistani will probably say that these simpletons vote because they are uneducated and cannot free themselves from the clutches of the feudal. But then this is not the trap laid by just the feudal elite. Feudalism has permeated all organisations and social levels in the country.

Moreover, the ‘simpletons’ realise that this is essentially a bureaucratic state where the only merit pertains to an individual’s ability to twist the law and provide its clients access to the resources of the state. The efficient civil and military bureaucrat will never allow the system of governance to function in a manner so that the common man is freed from the clutches of the feudal. So, why blame the simple people of this country or get upset about their lack of education? Their decisions are actually pretty good and serve their purpose. (Source: The urban-rural divide -By Ayesha Siddiqa: Dawn, Nov 2, 2007)

8 Responses to “Peasants for Democracy (PFD)”

  1. Who is this elite? – by Ayesha Siddiqa

    We are pleased to cross-post an excellent article by Dr Ayesha Siddiq on a topic of particular relevance to the LUBP’s policy and agenda. The LUBP represents aspirations and voices of moderate Pakistanis who are as weary of right-wing mullahs as they are weary of self-centred urban elite. According to Ameer Hamza, a commentator on Dr Siddiqa’s article at the ET website: “As always Dr Siddiqa’s article is precise and describes various ways of identifying our elite. I personally associate people who are rich as elite class. They are the ones who evade taxes, have foreign vacations and talk apple iphone and land cruisers. Off course they are in a minority but they hold this country hostage. They control businesses and they control who gets education and who gets justice, etc. My wife has added another class to elite definition: People who exclusively talk in English while they are in public. Well, she may just be right.”


    Who is this elite?

    In recent months, several articles published on these pages have referred to the elite’s myopia. A couple of months ago, I happened to attend a meeting at a think-tank where two firebrand speakers — one a young and upcoming analyst and the other an old, experienced, retired diplomat — castigated the stupidity of the elite. I found the conversation interesting because the two making such comments, like the rest of us sitting there, were part of the very elite they criticised. In fact, those who write for The Express Tribune or for other English newspapers are part of the elite too.

    This raises a fundamental question about the identity of our elite.Who is Pakistan’s elite? Is it the same as in 1947 or has it changed? If so, what is its current shape? Due to lack of quality social science research in this country, we have failed to acknowledge the evolution of the elite.

    Popularly, the word ‘elite’ is used as a derogatory term meaning powerful extortionists controlling the state and its resources. Elite is also considered synonymous with the landowning class. However, it is much more than that. Until the early 1970s, it also consisted of large business groups that came to be referred by Mahbubul Haq during the 1960s as the 22 most influential families. Sociologist and political scientist Hamza Alavi refers to the three classes of Pakistani elite: Feudal landowners, indigenous bourgeoisie and metropolitan capital.

    Unfortunately, all this solid research is forgotten and people now have their own definition of what is ‘elite’. There is the MQM definition which includes landowners and sugar-mill owners, but excludes business and industry in Karachi. The PML-N’s Shahbaz Sharif also warns against the elite by which he means those in the ruling PPP. Then there is Imran Khan’s terminology of the decadent elite that comprises all his opponents, but not the big-wigs who work with him. Not to forget the definition of religious parties that mainly includes people with a western-liberal leaning. All these approaches arereductionist and consider socio-economic evolution as a static process. In Pakistan’s case, the civil and military bureaucracy has remained politically powerful for at least 33-35 years, which means that other social groups were added to the list.

    Pakistan’s elite has evolved and also includes the ‘new rich’ — the upper-middle and the intermediary class (falling between the middle and upper-middle). These new entrants are not distinguished by birth, but by their capacity to generate capital, enter into a partnership with the permanent establishment, manipulate the state — its power and resources — and benefit from foreign capital inflows. This structure also means that birth is a secondary issue. So today, the Altaf Hussain clan, Asif Zardari, Imran Khan, Tariq Aziz, Generals Aslam Beg, Hamid Gul, Pervez Musharraf; entrepreneurs like Malik Riaz; media moghuls like Mir Shakeelur Rehman; stockbrokers like Aqeel Dedhi, or the LeT’s Hafiz Saeed and similar other militant leaders are the new elite versus the old such as the Jatois, Bhuttos, Talpurs, Sehgals and the Adamjees, who are now less important. The NGO sector is also part of the new elite.

    The access to foreign capital and abundance of black money backed by state power, has added new names to the elite list. In the past four decades or more, individuals and groups have used their position in relation to the traditional power centres and the state to acquire both capital and power. These two elements put them in a position where they can flout law without impunity, or use the state and its resources to extort greater power and influence. The extent of connectivity with the state allows them to enhance their financial worth. For instance, the elite of the development community use their access to the state to draw wealth from foreign donors and also use their association with the donor community to enhance their influence in the state. The process is cyclical.

    More important, this elite is interconnected and has taken the shape of a large fraternity of common interests. It is due to the expansion of the elite and its incestuous nature that Pakistan may not see a Tunisia kind of change. The stakeholders might want chaos, but they do not want to upset the gravy train.

    Published in The Express Tribune, February 6th, 2011.

  2. Yes! Finally someone writes about fake.

  3. I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here
    and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
    Superb work!

  4. Every single body part has the ability to provide pleasure.
    Yes, you do need to be sexually satisfied; sexual satisfaction makes you healthier, reduces tension in the body,
    and enhances well-being on all levels. The dissent focused on the majority’s intellectually dishonest tactic
    of resorting to Judeo-Christian history in order to differentiate between
    sodomy and the constitutionally protected privacy rights like the decision to marry or have children.

    She moaned, and he pounded her up against the cold steel metal.

  5. This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of
    your wonderful post. Also, I have shared
    your web site in my social networks!

  6. Hi, I do believe this is a great blog. I stumbledupon it ;
    ) I am going to return yet again since i have bookmarked
    it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you
    be rich and continue to guide other people.

  7. I’ve been browsing on-line greater than three hours as of late, but I by no means discovered
    any fascinating article like yours. It’s lovely worth sufficient for me.
    In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent
    content material as you probably did, the web shall be a lot
    more useful than ever before.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: